Electricity, Water and Utilities

Electricity, Water and Utilities

Couldn't run a bath let alone a ballot.

Paul Lister - Wednesday, December 11, 2013

As your bargaining representative we have been notified by TransGrid management that there were a number of error’s in their original non-union agreement document.

As a result TransGird have notified us that corrections have been made to the document and this has been re-circulated to staff for consideration.

Despite TransGrid executives receiving massive salaries it would appear that management are not up to the task of even being able to conduct a ballot on a proposal that they drafted.

As such we have been notified that the ballot period will now commence on Wednesday 18 December and close at midday on Monday 23 December - just in time for everyone to give management a Christmas present - a NO VOTE .

While TransGrid have had to change some things in their proposed non-union agreement there are many things that have not changed including…

  • No new or improved conditions in the proposed agreement.
  • By managements own admission the proposed agreement contains the trade off of conditions for all staff.
  • Absorption of future superannuation increases.
  • Less job security during a time of uncertainty.
  • Unfair pay increases of 2.85%, 2.9% and 2.9% while TransGrid executives get between 14.5% and 27%.

Nothing has changed from the unions perspective and we continue to encourage all staff to VOTE NO to the proposed agreement to force management to improve their offer and address employee’s concerns.

The ETU and other unions are committed to representing your interest throughout this process and we remain hopeful that we can secure a fair outcome if negotiations are recommenced.

TransGrid EA - Get the REAL Facts

Paul Lister - Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Below you will find an article from the Sydney Morning Herald that outlines the REAL TRANSGRID FACTS.

TransGrid executive members  received massive wage increases in 2013. The ETU is not asking for anything more or anything less than equal treatment for the workforce when it comes to wage determinations.

According to the SMH, TransGrid executives received between 14.5% and 27% increases to their wages plus superannuation in 2013.

When it comes to ETU members management expect you to be thankful  and accept a wage increase of 2.85%, 2.9% and 2.9%. In TransGrids own update on Monday 9 December they admit in their first explanatory note that you will have to trade off hard fought conditions.

The ETU makes no apologies in standing up for our members in order to secure a FAIR WAGE INCREASE WITHOUT ANY TRADE OFF’s and the IMPROVEMENT OF SOME EXISTING CLAUSES to provide additional job security in a time of uncertainty.

Click here to read the article and “Get the facts”.

 

TransGrid EA Depot Visits

Paul Lister - Tuesday, December 10, 2013

ETU Assistant Secretary, Paul Sinclair and Unions NSW Deputy Assistant Secretary, Adam Kerslake will be visiting Transgrid depots and locations between 9 December - 13 December to meet with TransGrid staff over the company’s proposed non-union agreement.

At these meetings members will be provided with an update on negotiations and you will hear why the proposed non-union agreement is bad for employees.

NEWCASTLE
8.00am Monday 9 December

TAMWORTH
2.00pm Tuesday 10 December

WAGGA WAGGA
8.30am Thursday 12 December

WALGROVE
3.00pm Thursday 12 December

SYDNEY (Trades Hall)
12.30pm Thursday 12 December

YASS (Bargaining Reps)
2.30pm Thursday 12 December

ORANGE
12.00 Midday Friday 13 December

All staff (union & non union) are encouraged to attend these information sessions.

It is important that members understand that the proposed non-union agreement requires many trade off’s in your conditions.

Under the company’s proposal you will lose multiple conditions for up to 0.4% pay increase. TransGrid also expect you to absorb future superannuation increases (1.25% over life of the agreement) as part of this deal - hardly good by any standard.

Voting will commence next Monday 16 December and ALL EMPLOYEES SHOULD VOTE NO TO THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT.

By voting NO you will force management back to the negotiating table.

If you have any questions please ask your workplace delegate of call Paul Sinclair on 0414 877 169.

TransGrid non-union EBA: Whats at Risk? VOTE NO for a fair deal

Paul Lister - Friday, December 06, 2013

TransGrid have now indicated that they have withdrawn from negotiations and that TransGrid will conduct a ballot on a non-union agreement commencing on Monday 16 December.

Members should be aware that the proposed agreement that you will be voting on represents significant trade off’s for a 0.4% wage increase.

Trade off’s include:

  • WAGE INCREASE - All employees are guaranteed the state wage policy of a 2.5% increase with ZERO trade off’s. What is really on offer under TransGrids non-union EBA is an increase of 0.35% / 0.4% / 0.4% but you will have to trade off many conditions to get less than half a percent pay increase.
  • SUPERANNUATION - Transgrid expect their employees to absorb future superannuation increases. Superannuation is set to increase by 1.25% over the life of the agreement but Transgrid want you to absorb this as part of their wage offer.
  • REMOVE THE 9 DAY FORTNIGHT – TransGrid want to remove the existing 9 day fortnight for Sydney office staff. This will be replaced with an inferior “flex time” arrangement. Flex time is different to an RDO because your manager must first agree to allow you to take the flex time – it is totally at the discretion of your manager and you get no say. The company has also threatened to remove the guaranteed 9 day fortnight for all other workers.
  • JOB SECURITYThe proposed non-union agreement does not protect employees from future forced redundancies, redeployment, salary maintenance and contracting out. Ausgrid, Endeavour and Essential have all undertaken redundancy & contracting out programs and it is only a matter of time until TransGrid does the same.
  • CUT TO SICK LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS – the proposed changes to sick leave by the company will reduce the number of sick days you can take before providing evidence and removing access to sick leave while on leave
  • CUT ANNUAL LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS – changes include restricting employee’s accumulations and forcing staff to cash in leave at the direction of the company without consultation.
  • NO CONSULTATIONTransgird want to impose corporate changes on employees without substantive consultation. This prevents employees from having a say on decisions that impact on their future but allows TransGrid to force corporate decisions on you regardless of the impact.
  • CHANGING HIGHER DUTIES – TransGrid will remove your right to claim Higher Duties for work performed at a higher level unless the time you perform the duties exceeds one day – this is a cut to your current conditions.
  • ALLOWANCES – the wage increase will not apply to Fares & Travel, Susso, Stand-by etc.

You will receive propaganda from the company as early as this afternoon and throughout next week asking you to support a substandard agreement that will leave the entire workforce worse off. The truth is that management believe its employees are weak and will simply roll over and accept a dud deal. It is important that you vote NO to the company’s proposed agreement and force management to return to the bargaining table.

The unions are committed to reaching a fair agreement that protects your long term interests, not an agreement that will leave you worse off for less than half of a percent wage increase.

Questions about the TransGrid EBA can be directed to ETU Assistant Secretary, Paul Sinclair.

TransGrid management walk away from negotiations, announce non-union EBA

Paul Lister - Friday, December 06, 2013

Members will be aware that negotiations on a new EA commenced in July this year. Over the past four months the negotiating committee comprising employee and union representatives have presented our log of claims.

Some of the union original log of claims included:

  • 9 day fortnight
  • No forced relocation and improved relocation allowance clause
  • Contracting out clause
  • Redundancy, redeployment and salary maintenance
  • Consultation clause
  • Dispute clause
  • On call allowance
  • Skills and training
  • 5% wage increase
  • Allowances

Some of management’s log of claims included:

  • Forced cashing out of leave
  • Scope of the agreement - more individual contracts
  • Overtime - Cut penalty rates on weekends & public holidays
  • Cut sick leave entitlements
  • Restrict the higher duties allowance
  • Absorb super increases
  • Cut allowances
  • And many more cuts!

While negotiations have been slow and tedious there were a number of log items that have either been agreed in principle or withdrawn. Despite this there are also a number of significant items that we have not been able to reach agreement on or the company has refused to negotiate over.

During the last meeting management were asked to reconsider their wages offer of 2.85% in light of reporting that day in the Sydney Morning Herald that the TransGrid management executive team had received pay increases ranging between 14% and 27% or almost ten times what the company was offering to ordinary workers.

The management team indicated that the company would not be increasing their wages offer. The union negotiating team indicated that we would need to talk to members and seek direction on the company’s offer.

The key sticking points at the conclusion of last weeks meeting were:

  • Loss of 9 day fortnight
  • Contracting out Clause
  • Redundancy, relocation, redeployment and salary maintenance
  • Consultation and dispute clauses
  • Cuts to sick leave including changing the number of days without evidence and access while on leave.
  • Higher duties/grade allowance
  • Cuts to annual leave including forcing employees to cash out leave
  • Allowances
  • Wage claim

On Friday 6 December TransGrid wrote to unions advising that the company had decided to withdraw from negotiations and instead proceed to a ballot with a non-union EBA. Any questions may be directed to ETU Assistant Secretary, Paul Sinclair.

Essential EBA Update 5 December

Paul Lister - Thursday, December 05, 2013

After long and arduous negotiations it appears that we have arrived at a point where a new agreement will be presented to Essential Energy members in the first quarter of next year but there are a number of things that must first occur before we get to any ballot.

To recap, members will recall that the employee negotiation team met with Essential Energy management on the 20th of November and agreed in principle on the new agreement. Following this meeting the negotiating team recommended the agreement to a meeting of ETU delegates who overwhelmingly endorsed the proposal.

Gary Humphries wrote to the ETU on the 21" of November confirming the offer from the company discussed the day before. This correspondence outlined a number of clauses that would be included in any new agreement - a copy of recent correspondence between the company and the ETU can be found below including a copy of the draft agreement.

On the 26th of November the ETU wrote to Vince Graham to seek guarantees on the matters of no forced redundancies and for amendments to the redundancy policy. Gary Humphries and Vince Graham responded to this correspondence on the 28th of November and the 3rd of December in which the company proposed changes to the management of surplus employees policy and indicated that the only form of redundancies for the life of the agreement will be voluntary.

While these letters provide some comfort it remains a fact that this correspondence sits outside the agreement. This approach is not dissimilar to the approach taken at Ausgrid and Endeavour so in this respect the draft Essential Energy agreement is the same.

On the 3rd of December the ETU responded to Vince Graham indicating that the exchange of correspondence providing changes to the redeployment policy and guarantees from Vince Graham on behalf of Essential Energy that there will be no forced redundancies, was acceptable to the union.

The final matter to be dealt with in these negotiations revolves around Scope and it has been agreed by both management and the unions on behalf of our members that this matter will be referred to the Fair Work Commission for Consent Arbitration. This matter is scheduled to be heard by Deputy President Hamberger on the 16th and 17th of December with further hearings possible sometime in January before we can expect a decision that may be handed down in late January or early February.

The ETU and Essential Energy have agreed on the above process in order to deal with the matter of scope. We believe that this process is fair and allows the independent umpire to make their decision. If the company refuse to stand by their word and do not proceed to consent arbitration or do not accept the outcome of the Fair Work Commission we will be left with no other option but to withdraw our in principle support for the draft agreement. This would be a major setback in negotiations.

Both parties have agreed to waive any appeal rights in this case and accept the outcome of the independent umpire.

Once this matter has been settled by the Fair Work Commission a draft agreement will be circulated to all Essential Energy employees - likely to be sometime in February. This draft agreement must be provided to the workforce for a period of 7 days before a ballot can commence. The ballot is likely to be a postal ballot conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission which generally takes three weeks after which time the votes are counted.

If the agreement is supported by a majority it will than proceed to the certification phase which can take another couple of weeks. If the agreement is voted down then we will be back at square one, all bets will be off and we start over again including the members' ability to apply for and take future protected industrial action if necessary.

Our current period of protected industrial action will expire on the 15th of December and while members did not need to undertake the threatened action, the simple fact that members were prepared to stand together and be counted was critical.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank every single delegate from across Essential Energy and in particular the employee reps on the negotiating team. This round of negotiations would have to be one of the most difficult that I can remember in recent times and the outcome that it looks like you have achieved is a credit to each and every one of you.

To all members I would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas and a safe new year and I will be sure to provide any further updates should this be necessary.

Yours in unity

Steve Butler

Click here to view correspondence between the ETU and Essential Energy.

Click here to view a copy of the draft agreement.

Fair Work Commission recommendation on Motor Vehicle Dispute

Paul Lister - Thursday, December 05, 2013

On the 5th of November 2013 the ETU put Ausgrid in dispute over the lack of consultation on their proposed Motor Vehicle Policy. Today Ausgrid, the ETU and USU appeared before the FWC on that Dispute. SDP Hamberger made the following recommendation-

It is recommended that:

  1. Staff briefings be held concerning the draft fleet motor vehicle allocation and use policy at a Divisional/Regional level through December 2013/January 2014, with union involvement;
  2. Individual allocation meetings occur and are completed by the end of January (where possible);
  3. A report back takes place at FWC on 7 February 2014. At the report back a master list of potentially affected employees will be provided by Ausgrid to the unions (subject to privacy considerations).

A meeting schedule will be developed and communicated so potentially affected members can attend and participate in consultation on the proposed MV Policy.

Any questions can be directed to ETU organisers Justin Page and Mark Buttigieg.

Ausgrid Update - ETU Bans & Defibrillators

Paul Lister - Friday, November 29, 2013

Members will recall that as a result of the tragic fatality at Essential Energy on 2nd September 2013, the ETU placed a safety ban on the restringing, re-tensioning or removal of overhead conductors where there are energised circuits either above or below the circuit being worked on unless the mains were isolated.

These measures were more conservative than Ausgrid’s Safety Alerts because we believed we needed to be conservative in the face of a fatality in order to ensure the safety of our members until such time as we could analyse any deficiencies in Ausgrid’s safety rules and procedures around this type of work.

Over the past few months and weeks we have been working cooperatively with Lineworker delegates and Ausgrid management in an attempt to make sure we come up with a more solid set of rules and procedures which materially lower the risk of this sort of thing happening at Ausgrid.

We are pleased to say that we have now reached that point with the introduction of several added layers of safety measures built in to the planning processes and work for these types of circumstances.

The key points of reforms are:

  • Emphasising the priority of “engineering out the hazard” in the planning and work stages. In other words “we must first consider isolating the energised conductors” before anything else.
  • The introduction of a pre-task checklist and risk assessment to cater for the specific risks involved in these circumstances.
  • The introduction of mandatory isolation of all Live LV exposed mains existing below isolated HV mains which are being erected, removed or restrung.
  • An agreement to introduce in to the Electrical Safety Rules a clause to deal with the Essential Energy situation i.e. Live HV mains above the mains being removed erected or re-strung.
  • Purchase of an extra 67 Automatic Emergency Defibrillators for on the job deployment on top of the 26 which Ausgrid already have.

The new safety processes agreed on will be rolled out by Ausgrid to relevant classifications in detailed toolbox talks over the coming week. As a result of these solid commitments by Ausgrid, members are advised that as soon as they have received the tool-box talk on the new processes and they are comfortable with their understanding of them – the ETU safety ban is lifted and Ausgrid’s safety alert processes will apply. It is important that members understand that until such time as they receive the toolbox talk – the ETU ban stays in place.

We would like to take this opportunity to congratulate all members on their extended support of this ETU safety initiative which once again has resulted in a safer environment for our members. It remains a sad indictment on the industry that major safety improvements such as these tend to happen as a reaction to tragic accidents such as the one at Essential Energy.

These things are never easy to deal with and we fully understand the frustration that it can sometimes cause. However, when we stay united and stick to our principles we can and do achieve great things for the collective good – particularly where it matters most on safety.

Essential EBA update 27 November

Paul Lister - Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Following last weeks meetings there are two points that the ETU have written to Vince Graham about seeking clarification and resolution. The issues in question are the "No forced redundancy" provisions and issues around the redeployment of employees.

You can read a copy of the full letter sent to Vince Graham here.

We will advise members the outcome of this matter once a response is received.

Endeavour Energy random alcohol testing

Paul Lister - Monday, November 25, 2013

Below is the agreement between the Company and the ETU as determined at the Fair Work Commission (FWC) earlier today.

This agreement is in respect of the Company’s ability to implement the Random Alcohol Testing component of the Drug and Alcohol Procedure and the recent refusal of members to participate in testing if requested.

(NOTE: The method for the drug testing component of the procedure is still to be resolved through arbitration next month).

Settlement of this matter is reached on the basis of the following terms:

“The union writes to all members saying:
a) It withdraws the direction unequivocally that members not participate in random alcohol testing;
b) That all members are to participate in employer requests for random alcohol testing without limitation, in accordance with the company procedure GHR9004;
c) The union will not reissue any instruction contrary to a) and b) above.

Any questions should be directed to your workplace delegate or ETU Organiser Brad Currey.