Join us 11.30am Thursday 16 November - Belmore Park, Sydney (near Central Station).
Join us 11.30am Thursday 16 November - Belmore Park, Sydney (near Central Station).
On Tuesday this week the combined union officials attended another meeting with Ausgrid management to work on progressing the agreement. The results of that meeting and the two prior ones were reported to the negotiating committee the next day. The following points represent areas where we believe significant progress has been made.
Major outstanding issues include:
Further negotiating meetings are scheduled for next week when we will have further updates.
0417 208 447 / email@example.com
Please see below a video update from ETU Organiser Mark Buttigieg. Should you have any questions please direct these to your workplace organiser or Mark.
In accordance with the last update, the combined union officials this week attended a two-day intensive negotiation with Ausgrid management in a bid to reach agreement on some basic concepts in relation to the following five major issues:
We are pleased to report that the two-day discussions proved worthwhile and productive with significant progress and varying degrees of in principle agreement on all five issues above. While agreement on the above remains at an in principle / conceptual stage, we are reasonably confident that we can translate these principles in to EBA clauses which satisfy both sides. Having said that there is a lot of work to do to achieve this, particularly in the CCR scheme.
In terms of a pay rise, whilst this was not the focus of discussions we made it clear to Ausgrid that their current offer of Year 1; 2.5% with subsequent annual 2% increases contingent on implementation of CCR, was inadequate given the 4-year wage freeze.
In the meantime, as instructed by the last delegates meeting on the 11th October - we are finalising our joint application to the FWC for the right to ballot our members to take protected action. It is important that members understand that we are proceeding with this in case negotiations once again break down. We must retain the ability to bring the matter to a head via protected industrial action if necessary. Whilst we are confident this will not be necessary we have been instructed by our members and their delegates to bring the matter to a head one way or another. It would be premature to say we have this agreement over the line.
We will be reporting back to the broader EBA negotiating committee on Wednesday 8th November with some reasonably firm proposals on the above issues. In the meantime, if you have any questions please feel free to contact your negotiating committee representative or respective organiser.
In Uniy - Mark Buttigieg
Last week we asked ETU Delegates to circulate the Essential Energy revised in-principle offer and seeking feedback from members. The overwhelming response has been ETU members support the concept of an early settlement, “rollover” of the Enterprise Agreement.
Essential Energy will issue employees with a notice of representational rights. This formally starts the bargaining process. The parties and representatives will meet to formalise a draft agreement to go to an electronic vote. This vote cannot take place within 21 days of the notice of representational rights being issued. A draft agreement and explanatory document needs to be circulated 7 days before any vote can be held.
The aim is to have a vote conducted early December.
Thank you to all the ETU Delegates for your continued efforts and enabling this to happen in such a short timeframe. Your efforts are much appreciated.
Mobile: 0414877301 / Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Wednesday the negotiating committee met with Ausgrid management to continue negotiations on the Ausgrid Agreement.
As promised last week, the combined unions again attempted to make progress by putting on the table a package of the four contentious clauses -- outside of the also contentious CCR proposal. These clauses have previously been identified as roadblocks to an Agreement.
A summary of our basic position on each clause was put as follows:
This package represents real concessions to Ausgrid while continuing to deliver on our key outcomes of job security, no trade-offs and a decent wage rise. It is a position that we think is worth fighting for all the way.
We also made it clear to Ausgrid that -- while we accept that the current skills structure mechanism for career advancement is somewhat dysfunctional and needs to improve - Ausgrid’s proposed CCR alternative will result in a severely downgraded pay scale for all your career paths. We have put the view that a combination of skills-based progression and performance-based pay may be a way forward.
The union also put the view that -- to have a hope of reaching a negotiated outcome -- we need to reach agreement on some basic concepts in relation to the major issues above. The fact that Ausgrid has already tabled an EBA proposal when some of the fundamental concepts on the major issues have not been agreed to makes negotiation very difficult. Ausgrid noted this view and has agreed to a smaller working group of union officials and Ausgrid management to try and reach in-principle agreement on the major issues above. This smaller group would then report back to the larger EBA negotiating committee with a view to working up the corresponding clauses if agreement on the basic concepts can be achieved.
In the meantime, in accordance with the resolution of the delegates meeting held on 11 October, we are finalising our application to the Fair Work Commission for a ballot of members to take protected industrial action. In accordance with what members have been telling us they want, the EBA matter will be brought to a head over the coming months.
Finally, Ausgrid has rejected our request for paid depot meetings and has said that we must hold meetings outside normal work hours. This is a concerning change from the last time we toured depots when access was given during work hours. It tells you a lot about Ausgrid’s unwillingness to allow us to speak to our members. What are they afraid of? If they think their current proposal is so great, surely it will sell itself! As a result, I will be scheduling after hours meetings over the next few weeks. It is important that these are well attended so that members get a thorough update on the negotiations and the industrial campaign we are about to conduct.
0417 208 447 | email@example.com
As reported yesterday, the ETU and Delegates called on Essential Energy to improve the in-principle offer which could see an early settlement of the Essential Energy Enterprise Agreement 2018. We sought improvements of a minimum cap on wages, bring second and third pay rise forward and revised wording on Individual Flexibility Arrangement clause. Essential Energy Board met today and the following improved offer has been put forward for the ETU and its member’s consideration.
Essential Energy revised offer seeks to genuinely progress discussions to see an early settlement. This revised offer front loads pay rises with the first pay rise being paid 1 Jan 2018 (6 month before expiry or current agreement) followed by an additional pay rise added in July 2018. The offer would see a total pay rise over 3.5 years of a minimum of 7% up to a maximum of 8.25%. The first pay rise on 1st January 2018 would be 2% as the rolling 12 months is at 1.8%.
The ETU is now seeking feedback from members on this in-principle “rollover” early settlement proposal. An in-principle agreement would then see a formal process start where representational rights would be issued by Essential, minimum 21 day negotiation period, new Enterprise Agreement drafted then put to a vote of all employees covered by the Enterprise Agreement.
If an in-principle agreement is not reached, the parties would enter into a traditional style negotiation (logs of claims) where the parties enter negotiations and seek to reach agreement on a new Enterprise Agreement to start at July 2018.
The ETU is asking Delegates to provide feedback from a depot level to myself by COB Tuesday 31st October 2017. Do the majority of members at your depot accept this “in-principle” offer? YES or NO.
0414 877 301 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Forty ETU Delegates from Essential Energy met at our ETU Sydney Office yesterday to hear an Enterprise Agreement proposal from Essential CEO John Cleland. The intention was to ascertain the views of the ETU on an early settlement of the Essential Energy Enterprise Agreement 2018 negotiations.
The Delegate’s had the opportunity to hear directly from John and to ask questions about Essentials proposal. After considering the proposal the Delegates called on Essential to improve the offer by putting a minimum cap of 2% in place and bring the second and third wage increase forward. The parties will work on wording for the IFA Clause.
John committed to consider the ETU’s counter proposal and respond in a timely manner. When questioned about Essentials the intent of reaching an early agreement, John’s response was the Business needs to reform through less bureaucracy, better systems and processes, improved technology, not by making changes to the Enterprise agreement.
On the question of redundancies John stated there will not be any massive wholesale redundancies. Essential are achieving reductions through voluntary redundancies and natural attrition. There will be further reductions through improved technology, but it is anticipated it will be through voluntary redundancies.
On Wednesday the negotiating committee met with Ausgrid management to continue negotiations on the Ausgrid Agreement. Most of the meeting was occupied with Ausgrid providing dollar amounts attached to their proposed Career Capability and Remuneration scheme. We will shortly be providing detailed individual examples of why this scheme will result in pay and career paths being shut down.
It is important that members understand how this scheme works and why Ausgrid are so desperate to implement it – because it will save them millions of dollars on their wage bill going forward. Under the current skills progression scheme employees can progress up a career path so long as they provide evidence that they:
Points are allocated to each skill as they are attained, and progression is based on provision of that evidence. Ausgrid do not like this scheme because they say it results in a level of progression which is too automatic – in other words it costs them too much to pay everyone what they’re worth.
Under the proposed Ausgrid scheme you will no longer proceed up your career path based on evidence but on managerial discretion. If you are a Line worker or Jointer or Subs fitter and you could have reasonably expected to progress up to a certain level in your structure by gaining skills, now you will be expected to use those skills and perform the higher-grade duties with no extra pay. If your manager decides that this “exceeds expectations” then they may grant you some extra pay points along the way – but they don’t have to. Then when you apply for a vacant role via the normal merit appointment process you will be appointed at the new level pay point of that role which in most circumstances is significantly less than the current value of those roles. For some classifications for example - the top of the structure - will drop by $20,000.00
Ausgrid are saying is that they are going to save a huge bucket of money over the life of the agreement by supressing your career paths and in return you’ll get a few crumbs – if your manager says you can have them!
At the same EBA meeting the combined unions also asked Ausgrid what their position on a cap on forced redundancies is and Ausgrid’s response was to say that they had not considered the cap. In other words, they came back to the meeting with nothing. Ask yourself why would Ausgrid not agree to a cap on how many people they can force out the door after July 2020? The only conclusion one can come to is that they want to sack everyone. Currently they can’t do that because the current agreement contains no forced redundancies and we will not negotiate a new agreement that does not include a cap which is necessary to provide job security for you.
In a bid to progress negotiations - the combined unions suggested that we present a package of 4 contentious clauses which have previously been identified as road blocks by Ausgrid for them to respond;
This package will be presented at the next EBA meeting on Wednesday 25th October. We are doing everything in our power to get a negotiated outcome but Ausgrid are making this much more difficult than it needs to be by demanding concessions and taking from workers while not giving anything back.
In the meantime, the unions will be applying to the Fair Work Commission early next week for the right to ballot our members to take industrial action – this is in line with last week’s delegates resolution.
I will shortly be touring depots and updating members on these matters. It is important that members remember that we only get decent outcomes when we are prepared to stand up for our fair share and fight. We will always talk to Ausgrid but there comes a time when we need action, now is that time.
Lets not forget that between 2014-16 Ausgrid executive’s received an increase averaging 5.33% while everyone else’s real wages went backwards. You deserve an unconditional annual wage increase and 3% is very reasonable.
0417 208 447 / email@example.com
The ETU has secured a big win for Endeavour Energy members relating to Long Service Leave accruals and how they are paid after ETU Member Nick McWhirter (Snr) stood up with the support of the union against Endeavour Energy.
The dispute centered around Long Service Leave entitlements and accruals where employee's change their working hours - ie moving from a 36hr/wk to 40hr/wk in Nick's case.
This dispute commenced in May last year and was subject to a number of meetings with the Company, Fair Work Commission Conciliation conferences, Fair Work Commission Arbitration Hearing (where the decision went against Nick & the ETU) and a Fair Work Commission Appeal before a Full Bench of 3 Commissioners…where Nick and the ETU team were successful. This is a big win and a precedent setting decision as a result of ETU action.
The dispute centered around the members Long Service Leave entitlement being identified and recorded in “Hours” which didn’t equate to his entitlement of “Weeks” he had accrued in accordance with the EBA for his “Years of Service”. This meant the member was being short changed his Long Service Leave entitlement worth approximately $9,500.00.
The Company has recorded the LSL entitlement the member had accrued while working a 36hr/wk arrangement, recorded in “Hours” not “Weeks”, and never adjusted the accrual for this period to accord with the remainder of his current “Years of Service” under a 40hr/wk arrangement.
In practical terms this meant that the member would be paid for taking his Long Service based on his current 40hr/wk wage (which is appropriate), however, because the LSL entitlement was being recorded in “Hours” not “Weeks”, and was never adjusted for his current 40hr/wk working arrangements, meant his recorded LSL would run out before his LSL entitlement accrual in “Weeks” was used (or paid out if he had left the Company) thus short changing his entitlement.
In short, in the Appeal we were able to demonstrate an error of the Commission’s Arbitration Decision regarding the interpretation of the Long Service Leave provisions in the EBA.
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench ordered (or words to the effect)
Check your LSL Accrued Entitlement
To all members who have changed their ordinary hours of work/week you might want to check your LSL entitlement. This can be done by dividing the LSL “Hours” recorded on your pay slip by your ordinary hours of work each week. This will identify your recorded LSL entitlement in “Weeks”. Then establish your actual LSL entitlement in “Weeks” from Clause 15 of the EBA and see if they are the same (if you have taken any Long Service Leave remember to deduct that amount).
If there is a difference, then you may wish to discuss this with your local Delegate, contact the ETU, or myself, to assist in resolving the anomaly.
|Shopping cart is empty.|